Ethics

p A CHRISTIAN CRITIQUE OFMODERNISM AND POST MODERNISMA revue of Chapters 4 and 5 of Choosing the dear by Dennis Hollingerp In Choosing the broad(a) , Professor Dennis Hollinger analyzes modernism and post-modernism . slice he offers much solemn material , he burdens his view with his belief that his aggressively Christian approach is the only valid moral or estimable outlookDoctor Hollinger argues that modernism arose from the rationalism and empiricism of the Enlightenment period , and from the industrial revolution (ch . 4 . He covers a good tidy sum of material concisely and clearly . As he does so , however , he undercuts his own credibility by the compact margin of his views . One event appears as he discusses the force of Isaac north . Hollinger quotes Alexander Pope 92s epitaph for Newton : 93Nature and Na ture 92s equitys put hid in night God said ` 91Let newton be 92 and both was light 94 He brings this epitaph in through other Christian scholar , who says that modernist claim that with Newton 93the darkness of ignorance , intolerance , and pietism was being banished 94 (91 quoting from Newbigin 65 ) Given that Pope expressly attri moreovered the man of Newton to God , and that Newton was a Christian (Durant 524 , 542-44 , the insinuation that Newton was responsible for dismissing Christianity seems questionable . Similarly his efforts to pick the castigate of Christianity on Rene Descartes (90-91 ) appear hollow . Descartes offered a philosophical certainty of the existence of God (Durant 160 ) In extension to these philosophers Hollinger blames industrialisation , with its attendant technological outgrowths , and a sociology of modernization for lessen the act of Christianity in modern ordination (93-103 ) However , he offers hardly a(prenominal) alternative s . Indeed , at time his examples atomic n! umber 18 laboured .

For example 93We do not depend on the benevolence of the brand carrier to withdraw our mail delivered 94 (98 ) True , and are we come apart off for not having to curry the esteem of so umteen of those whose ly completion of their appointed rounds makes life easier ? in-person relationships with all of these mickle might be pleasant , but they are very much impractical , and would we be bump off in a social in which the postal carrier was free to be non-benevolentA Christian Critique of modernity and Post Modernism rascal In this chapter , Hollinger several multiplication alludes to the dec line of the moral basis of one particular try : law . He contends that it is because of change magnitude technology that law has combined with redress to eliminate the innovation of fault and its consequences from umpteen legal disputes in modern baseball club (98 , citing Wilson ) While modern tort law and the use of indemnification have cut down 93fault 94 as a basis for recovery , Hollinger takes a position bing on the bizarre to suggest that indian lodge would be better off with fault rules rather than redress By eliminating fault from many tort (i .e , personal attenuate ) situations society has greatly simplified recovery for injured parties and lessen the burden of endless trials over question of fault , trials which fattened...If you unavoidableness to put a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper