Political Philosophy and Brief Critical Evaluation Essay

adjudicate essay questions? 1. Describe Platos scheme for communism in the Republic. (Discuss separately of the main features of this life-style. ) Which classes, according to Plato, should practice this guidance of sustenance? What justification does Plato entreat for advocating communism? propose a brief detailed evaluation of Platos communism. PHL 107 study guide for exam 2 page 4 2. (1) in brief describe Platos allegory of the cave.(2) Then state how the allegory expresses Platos persuasion on (a) the place of the Philosopher-Kings in Platos utopia, (b) Platos line between opinion and genuine knowledge (wisdom), and (c) Platos position on the motives of the Philosopher-Kings for ruling. 3. (1) What is Platos dualistic metaphysics? (2) How is this metaphysics expressed in the allegory of the cave? (3) How is it cerebrate to his position on the nature of the human person? 4. (1) What is Platos sound judgement of democracy, and (2) how is this linked to his scheme of justice?(3) How might a contemporary guardian of democracy respond to Plato? 5. What is the mimetic theory of art? Did Plato invent this theory? Did he accept it? How is this theory related to Platos criticisms of the liberal arts? 6. (1) What deuce reasons does Plato give for proposing to banish the arts from his Republic? (2) How is his position on the arts related (a) to his Theory of Ideas and (b) his position on the highest goal of human living? (3) Offer a brief critical evaluation of Platos position on the arts.7. (1) What does Rawls mean by the original position . . . under the obscure of ignorance and how does this serve as the basis for his theory of justice? (2) What are his 2 principles of justice? Explain the two principles.? (3) Offer a brief critical evaluation of his theory of justice. 8. (1) Starting with Rawls original position . . . under the humeral veil of ignorance, do you think you would arrive at a principle or principles of justice similar to those of Raw ls, or if different ones, which? typify your position. (2) As persona of your answer give a clear statement of what Rawls means by the original position . . . under the veil of ignorance. 9. (1) What is Aquinass causative disceptation for the existence of God (the 2nd of his five causes)? Sketch the argument. (2) critically evaluate the argument. What appears to be the weakest part of the argument? Do you think the argument can be defended in the face of this proposed weakness? Explain. 10. (1) What is the design argument for the existence of God?You may present either Aquinass (his 5th) or William Paleys or the fine-tuning version of the argument (but only one). (2) wherefore does Darwins theory of evolution appear to undermine Aquinas and Paleys version of the design argument? Why does Darwins theory non affect the fine-tuning argument? (3) Do you think that there is some way of salvaging the design argument in the face of Darwins theory? Defend your position. 11. Describe Hobbes state of nature. What kind of a concept is this historical, empirical, anthropological, analytic? Explain.Offer your own critical evaluation of Hobbes notion of the state of nature? Do you think it is a useful concept? Is it true? Defend your position. 12. Hobbes argues that distributively person has the resources within themselves to overcome the state of nature.? (1) What are these resources and how do they ease the person to overcome the state of nature? (2) But why, for Hobbes, are these native resources insufficient? Why is a very strong sovereign in any case needed to overcome the state of nature? (3) What role does contract or covenant play in overcoming the state of nature?